AI Agents Do Not Fail Alone:The Context Fails First
Quick Answer
The paper emphasizes that AI agents' failures are rooted in weak context rather than isolated issues.
Quick Take
The paper emphasizes that AI agents' failures are rooted in weak context rather than isolated issues. It introduces ProofAgent-Harness, an open-source tool for evaluating AI agents based on seven context criteria, demonstrating that context quality significantly predicts behavioral outcomes such as hallucination resistance and instruction adherence.
Key Points
- is crucial for reliable AI agent performance.
- ProofAgent-Harness evaluates context quality across seven criteria.
- Higher context quality correlates with better agent behavior outcomes.
- Criteria include role clarity, guardrail coverage, and instruction consistency.
- Context measurement serves as a preflight signal for agent reliability.
Paper Resources
📖 Reader Mode
~2 min readAbstract:Context engineering has become central to building reliable AI agents, yet it remains largely unmeasured. Agents do not fail in isolation: their behavior is shaped by the instructions, tools, memory, retrieved knowledge, guardrails, and untrusted inputs accumulated in their context. When this context is weak, agents drift, hallucinate, misuse tools, ignore constraints, become vulnerable to injection, and waste tokens. This paper validates context-engineering quality as an independent leading indicator of agent reliability. We implement the measurement in ProofAgent-Harness, an open-source infrastructure for AI agent evaluation that uses multi-juror, consensus-based scoring. The harness assesses context across seven criteria: role clarity, guardrail coverage, instruction consistency, tool schema quality, grounding sufficiency, injection hardening, and token efficiency. Crucially, the context score is isolated from behavioral metrics and release decisions, enabling a non-circular validation. Through a controlled context-quality study across regulated agent domains, holding frontier LLM agents fixed and varying only their operating context, we show that context-quality criteria consistently predict their corresponding behavioral outcomes. Grounding sufficiency predicts hallucination resistance, guardrail coverage predicts manipulation resistance, instruction consistency predicts instruction following, and tool-schema quality predicts tool use. These findings establish context measurement as a validated preflight signal for agent reliability and position context engineering as an auditable layer of agent evaluation and governance.
| Comments: | 24 pages, 1 figure |
| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2607.14275 [cs.AI] |
| (or arXiv:2607.14275v1 [cs.AI] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.14275 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Fouad Bousetouane [view email]
[v1]
Wed, 15 Jul 2026 18:33:02 UTC (1,097 KB)
— Originally published at arxiv.org
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from arXiv cs.AI
See more →Automatic Ordinary Differential Equations Discovery For Biological Systems Using Large Language Model Powered Agentic System
The MEDA system utilizes large language models and symbolic regression to autonomously discover ordinary differential equations for biological systems, achieving strong structural recovery and biologically plausible models. It outperforms existing methods by integrating domain knowledge and mechanistic constraints, demonstrating effective retrieval and extrapolation capabilities.