Meta kills Muse Image feature that let anyone generate AI photos of Instagram users without consent
Quick Answer
Meta has discontinued its Muse Image feature that allowed users to generate AI images of Instagram users without consent, following backlash.
Quick Take
Meta has discontinued its Muse Image feature that allowed users to generate AI images of Instagram users without consent, following backlash. The feature, which was enabled by default, required users to opt out manually, and Meta acknowledged it 'missed the mark' shortly after its launch.
Key Points
- Muse Image allowed AI image generation using public Instagram usernames without consent.
- Meta faced significant criticism, leading to the feature's quick discontinuation.
- Users had to manually opt out to prevent their images from being used.
- The feature likely wouldn't have complied with European data protection laws.
- Meta's approach may have been inspired by OpenAI's discontinued Sora app.
📖 Reader Mode
~1 min readMeta has pulled a controversial feature from its new Muse Image model after widespread criticism. The feature let users generate AI images of other people by @-mentioning their public Instagram accounts, no consent needed, just a username. It was on by default, and anyone who didn't want their photos used had to manually opt out through Instagram's settings.
Meta admitted "this feature missed the mark" and shut it down just days after announcing it. The company said it had wanted to offer "a useful creative tool and to give people control over whether their public content could be referenced in this way." In Europe, the feature likely wouldn't have survived anyway due to stricter data protection rules.
Meta may have borrowed the idea from OpenAI's now-discontinued Sora app, which let users create "cameos" of themselves and, with permission, allow others to use those in their videos. The feature was a viral hit at launch, but interest faded fast.
— Originally published at the-decoder.com
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from The Decoder
See more →
An AI model programmed nonstop for 19 days on a single MirrorCode task that cost $2,600 to run
Epoch AI's MirrorCode benchmark reveals Claude Opus 4.7 as the leader with a 56% solve rate, reconstructing a 16,000-line toolkit in 14 hours. Despite this, all models tested struggle with the most complex tasks, highlighting limitations in current AI capabilities. The single task consumed $2,600 over 19 days, raising questions about cost-effectiveness in AI development.
