Advancing Creative Physical Intelligence in Large Multimodal Models
Quick Answer
The paper introduces MM-CreativityBench to assess large multimodal models' (LMMs) creative problem-solving in visually rich environments.
Quick Take
The paper introduces MM-CreativityBench to assess large multimodal models' (LMMs) creative problem-solving in visually rich environments. Current LMMs struggle with grounded exploration, often missing relevant entities and hallucinating attributes, prompting the authors to propose affordance-grounded alignment to enhance performance in selecting correct entities and reducing errors.
Key Points
- MM-CreativityBench benchmarks creative in multimodal environments.
- Current LMMs often overlook relevant entities and hallucinate attributes.
- Proposed affordance-grounded alignment improves attribute-affordance reasoning.
- enhances grounded exploration in LMMs.
- Results show reduced hallucination and improved entity selection accuracy.
Paper Resources
Article Content
From source RSS / original summaryarXiv:2605. 26396v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large multimodal models (LMMs) have rapidly advanced in perception and reasoning; however, it remains unclear whether these capabilities generalize to discovering visually grounded solutions in open-ended environments, beyond pattern recognition. In such settings, intelligence requires more than answering well-posed questions: it involves identifying how elements in a scene can be repurposed in non-obvious yet physically feasible ways.
This form of creative problem-solving is central to human intelligence, but remains largely untested in current benchmarks. To evaluate this ability, we introduce MM-CreativityBench, a benchmark for affordance-grounded creative in visually rich, physically constrained environments.
Each instance presents a scenario image with structured views of candidate entities and their parts, enabling fine-grained, interactive evaluation of how models iteratively inspect the scene, identify relevant affordances, and compose visually and physically grounded solutions. Our experiments show that current LMMs often fall short, not due to lack of generative capability, but because they do not sustain grounded exploration.
Models often overlook relevant entities, under-examine critical parts, or hallucinate attributes not grounded in the image. Motivated by this failure mode, we propose affordance-grounded alignment, which casts creative tool use as a preference learning problem. Using , we encourage models to prefer attribute-affordance reasoning grounded in visual evidence over hallucinated alternatives.
In addition, we incorporate supervision derived from an affordance knowledge base to guide broader entity exploration and multi-turn planning. Our results show consistent gains in selecting the correct entities and parts, while substantially reducing hallucination and grounding-related errors.
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from arXiv cs.AI
See more →Adversarial Social Epistemology for Assemblies of Humans and Large Language Models
The paper introduces Adversarial Social Epistemology (ASE) to analyze how agents manipulate trust in public communications, highlighting mechanisms that undermine the reliability of testimony and inference. It critiques existing frameworks like epistemic bubbles and misinformation diffusion, proposing a new language for understanding trust breaches and auditing inferential chains in densely interactive environments involving humans and large language models.