FORCE-Bench: A Benchmark, Dataset, and Evaluation Harness for Agentic AI in Enterprise Finance
Quick Answer
FORCE-Bench introduces a specialized benchmark for evaluating agentic AI in finance, featuring 251 expert-annotated queries across eight dimensions.
Quick Take
Results indicate that general-purpose systems often fail to meet finance-specific quality standards, while the Finance Agent for Microsoft 365 Copilot performs reliably. The dataset and evaluation tools are released as open-source for broader application.
Key Points
- FORCE-Bench evaluates agentic systems on accuracy, citations, clarity, and more.
- The benchmark includes tasks like financial obligation research and business brief generation.
- General-purpose agents struggle under operational constraints in finance environments.
- The Finance Agent for Microsoft 365 Copilot outperforms general-purpose systems.
- All resources, including the dataset and rubrics, are available as open-source.
DeepSignal Analysis
What happened
FORCE-Bench has been introduced as a benchmark for evaluating agentic AI systems in the finance sector. It includes 251 expert-annotated queries across eight dimensions relevant to operational finance. The evaluation revealed that general-purpose AI systems often do not meet the specific quality standards required in finance, while the Finance Agent for Microsoft 365 Copilot performed reliably.
Key evidence
- FORCE-Bench evaluates agentic systems using a rubric-based framework across eight dimensions: accuracy, citations, clarity, depth, groundedness, recency, relevance, and structure.
- The benchmark assesses three task types: financial obligation research, financial entity performance research, and business brief generation, reflecting real deployment conditions.
- Results indicated that general-purpose agentic systems do not consistently meet finance-domain quality requirements, while the Finance Agent for Microsoft 365 Copilot was more reliable.
Why it matters
The introduction of FORCE-Bench addresses a gap in existing benchmarks that typically focus on general capabilities rather than the specific needs of operational finance. This specialized evaluation framework is crucial for ensuring that AI systems can provide accurate, verifiable, and rule-compliant information in financial contexts. The open-source release of the dataset and evaluation tools allows for broader application and adaptation, potentially improving the deployment of AI in finance.
Paper Resources
Source Excerpt
Recent advances in have accelerated deployment of agentic systems in operational finance. Existing benchmarks emphasize measuring general capabilities, instruction following, or safety, but few directly address the operational finance workflows that agentic systems are now being deployed to automate. Finance professionals require agents to not only provide factually sound and properly grounded information, but also ensure that this information is verifiable and consistently
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from arXiv cs.AI
See more →RAIL Guard: Closing the Evaluation-to-Remediation Gap in Responsible AI for Agents
RAIL Guard introduces a closed-loop AI pipeline for large language models (LLMs) that evaluates outputs across eight dimensions and iteratively remediates failures, achieving 96.9% convergence compared to 49.1% for traditional block-and-retry methods. The system reduces unsafe agent executions by 33% without impacting task completion and is available as open-source SDKs.