Extracting Training Data from Diffusion Language Models via Infilling
Quick Answer
The study introduces 'infilling extraction' for diffusion language models (DLMs) like LLaDA-8B and Dream-7B, revealing that edge-conditioned masks can extract up to three times more verbatim sequences than prefix-conditioned methods.
Quick Take
This highlights the significant risk of training data extraction, especially for personally identifiable information, outperforming autoregressive models in recall metrics.
Key Points
- Infilling extraction allows arbitrary binary masks for data extraction in DLMs.
- Edge-conditioned masks outperform prefix-conditioned ones, extracting three times more data.
- Bidirectional access in DLMs reveals channels unavailable in autoregressive models.
- Adversaries can extract redacted email addresses more effectively from DLMs.
- Tunable decoding parameters significantly impact extraction performance.
Paper Resources
Article Content
From source RSS / original summaryarXiv:2605. 24173v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Memorization in has been studied almost exclusively through prefix-conditioned extraction, a natural choice for autoregressive models. However, diffusion language models (DLMs) can denoise masked tokens at arbitrary positions. Thus, prefix-only probing reveals only one facet of memorization in DLMs and significantly underestimates the risk of training-data extraction.
In order to realistically model extractability of training data in DLMs, we introduce \emph{infilling extraction}, a data-extraction protocol parameterized by an arbitrary binary mask that subsumes prefix-only probing and accounts for the bidirectional inductive bias of DLMs.
Instantiating it on LLaDA-8B and Dream-7B across five extraction modes, three training pipelines, and three corpora covering verbatim and partial leakage, we find that mask geometry governs extractability: edge-conditioned masks \emph{extract up to three times more} verbatim sequences than prefix-conditioned ones, and bidirectional access opens channels inaccessible in autoregressive models.
In particular, we show that a realistic adversary with access to training data where personally identifiable information has been redacted, can even achieve higher recall on extracting redacted email addresses from DLMs than from scale-matched autoregressive models. Tunable parameters for decoding measurably affect extraction performance, while a follow-up supervised finetuning stage does not eliminate the prior memorization.
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from arXiv cs.CL
See more →TriAgent: Divergence-Aware Committees for Cost-Efficient Financial Sentiment Analysis
TriAgent introduces a cost-efficient multi-agent system for financial sentiment analysis, combining VADER, FinBERT, and Qwen2.5. It achieves an F1 score of ~0.87 with significant savings of $9.3M/year at a 10M-user scale compared to GPT-4o-mini, while also detecting hallucinations with an AUC of 0.90.