OpenAI's IPO slips as Altman tells staff to expect a public offering "within the next year"
Quick Answer
Sam Altman informed OpenAI employees to anticipate an IPO within the next year, though a potential delay to 2027 exists.
Quick Take
This caution may stem from concerns over self-improving AI, but competition from Anthropic's robust growth and upcoming IPO could be influencing the decision.
Key Points
- Altman expects OpenAI's IPO within the next year.
- A delay to 2027 is a possibility due to caution.
- Concerns about self-improving AI are cited as a reason.
- Anthropic's growth and IPO may be influencing OpenAI's timeline.
📖 Reader Mode
~1 min read
Jun 10, 2026
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman told employees via Slack he expects an IPO "within the next year." The already filed prospectus was just about keeping "optionality if we want to go sooner." A slip to 2027 would surprise many, especially since Anthropic appears set to go public in the coming weeks.
Altman has good reason to wait: Anthropic's growth numbers look stronger, and OpenAI is still burning cash. Going public now risks losing valuation ground. Altman frames the delay differently, of course. Progress on self-improving AI could push back the IPO because "technology and the world may change in surprising ways, and there might be good reasons to be a private company during that time." Then again, the massive capital needs for compute infrastructure could speed things up, he said. Altman also announced an upcoming stock sale for employees at $687.69 per share.
OpenAI is preparing a new model codenamed 5.6, too. Research lead Jakub Pachocki calls it a big step up from GPT-5.5, with a possible June release. Anthropic has already set a high bar with Fable and Mythos 5.
— Originally published at the-decoder.com
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from The Decoder
See more →
An AI model programmed nonstop for 19 days on a single MirrorCode task that cost $2,600 to run
Epoch AI's MirrorCode benchmark reveals Claude Opus 4.7 as the leader with a 56% solve rate, reconstructing a 16,000-line toolkit in 14 hours. Despite this, all models tested struggle with the most complex tasks, highlighting limitations in current AI capabilities. The single task consumed $2,600 over 19 days, raising questions about cost-effectiveness in AI development.
