Can Language Model Agents be Helpful Circuit Explainers in Mechanistic Interpretability?
Quick Answer
This study introduces AgenticInterpBench, a benchmark for circuit explanation using LM agents like HyVE, which generates component-level explanations through iterative observation and validation.
Quick Take
This study introduces AgenticInterpBench, a benchmark for circuit explanation using LM agents like HyVE, which generates component-level explanations through iterative observation and validation. Results show varying performance across four LM backbones, highlighting the potential of LM agents in mechanistic interpretability, though reliable validation remains a challenge.
Key Points
- AgenticInterpBench consists of 84 semi-synthetic transformer circuits with 163 annotations.
- HyVE employs an iterative process of observation, hypothesis generation, and causal validation.
- No single LM backbone consistently outperforms others in generating explanations.
- Strong backbones typically create observation-grounded hypotheses, but validation issues persist.
- A case study on Llama-3-8B demonstrates applicability beyond semi-synthetic benchmarks.
Paper Resources
Article Content
From source RSS / original summaryarXiv:2606. 24026v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mechanistic interpretability has made substantial progress in automatically localizing circuits, but explaining what localized components do remains labor-intensive and difficult to standardize. In this work, we study whether language model (LM) agents can assist with this explanation problem once a circuit has already been identified.
We introduce AgenticInterpBench, a benchmark for circuit explanation built from 84 semi-synthetic transformer circuits with 163 component-level annotations. We propose HyVE (Hypothesize, Validate, Explain), an agentic explainer that analyzes each component through an iterative loop of observation, hypothesis generation, and causal validation, eventually producing a component-level explanation and a circuit-level task description.
Across four LM backbones, HyVE recovers useful component- and task-level explanations, but no backbone is uniformly best. Our analysis shows that strong backbones usually form observation-grounded hypotheses, while failures more often arise later in the validation loop, through incomplete validation plans, code execution errors, or unresolved hypotheses. A case study on an arithmetic circuit in Llama-3-8B shows that the same formulation can extend beyond semi-synthetic benchmarks to naturally trained models.
Overall, LM agents are promising circuit explainers, but reliable validation remains the key obstacle.
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from arXiv cs.AI
See more →Arbor: Tree Search as a Cognition Layer for Autonomous Agents
Arbor introduces a framework utilizing structured tree search for optimizing LLM inference, achieving up to 193% throughput-latency improvement compared to vendor-optimized systems. It employs an Orchestrator and Critic agent for stability and coordination, demonstrating hardware-agnostic performance with minimal variance.