Hallucination Mitigation with Agentic AI, Nested Learning, and AI Sustainability via Semantic Caching
Quick Answer
This paper presents a Nested Learning architecture with Continuum Memory Systems to mitigate hallucinations in LLMs, achieving a Total Hallucination Score reduction of 31.3% to 35.9% across five configurations.
Quick Take
This paper presents a Nested Learning architecture with Continuum Memory Systems to mitigate hallucinations in LLMs, achieving a Total Hallucination Score reduction of 31.3% to 35.9% across five configurations. Semantic caching resulted in a 47.3% hit rate, lowering LLM invocations and operational costs, while enhancing factual reliability and auditability without retraining models.
Key Points
- Three-stage agentic pipeline evaluated using five key performance indicators.
- Semantic caching achieved 440 hits out of 930 calls, reducing energy footprint.
- ExtremeObservability configuration yielded the most negative Total Hallucination Score of -0.0709.
- Asymmetric design with high-stochasticity generator improved hallucination mitigation.
- Findings suggest operational efficiency can be enhanced without model retraining.
Paper Resources
Article Content
From source RSS / original summaryarXiv:2605. 29055v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hallucination remains a major reliability barrier for production LLM systems, particularly in pipelines where unsupported claims can propagate unchecked across stages. This paper adapts a HOPE-inspired Nested Learning architecture with Continuum Memory Systems (CMS) and semantic similarity caching to a hybrid benchmark of 310 prompts combining 217 epistemic-uncertainty prompts and 93 fabrication-induction stress-test prompts.
A three-stage agentic pipeline orchestrated via the Open Floor Protocol (OFP) is evaluated with five KPIs -- FCD (Factual Claim Density), FGR (Factual Grounding References), FDF (Fictional Disclaimer Frequency), ECS (Explicit Contextualization Score), and OSR (Observability Score Ratio) -- aggregated into THS (Total Hallucination Score) across five weighting configurations to study mitigation-observability trade-offs.
FDF, ECS, OSR, and FGR are subtracted as mitigation signals, so that a more negative THS indicates stronger mitigation. The FrontEndAgent is configured as a high-stochasticity generator (temperature = 1. 0) to produce a realistic hallucination baseline, while the SecondLevelReviewer and ThirdLevelReviewer operate as progressive correctors. This asymmetric design yields end-to-end THS reductions of -31. 3% to -35. 9% across five weighting configurations.
Semantic caching achieves 440 cache hits over 930 potential calls (47. 3% hit rate), reducing LLM invocations to 490, lowering energy and CO2e footprint, and making multi-stage review pipelines operationally viable at production scale. ExtremeObservability attains the most negative final THS (-0. 0709), confirming that observability-heavy configurations reinforce rather than compromise mitigation.
These findings suggest that memory-augmented multi-agent designs can jointly improve factual reliability, operational efficiency, and auditability without model retraining.
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from arXiv cs.AI
See more →Adversarial Social Epistemology for Assemblies of Humans and Large Language Models
The paper introduces Adversarial Social Epistemology (ASE) to analyze how agents manipulate trust in public communications, highlighting mechanisms that undermine the reliability of testimony and inference. It critiques existing frameworks like epistemic bubbles and misinformation diffusion, proposing a new language for understanding trust breaches and auditing inferential chains in densely interactive environments involving humans and large language models.