Anthropic scales Project Glasswing to 150 partners across 15 countries to hunt critical software flaws
Quick Answer
Anthropic has expanded Project Glasswing to 150 partners in over 15 countries, utilizing Claude Mythos Preview to identify critical software vulnerabilities.
Quick Take
Anthropic has expanded Project Glasswing to 150 partners in over 15 countries, utilizing Claude Mythos Preview to identify critical software vulnerabilities. This initiative has already uncovered over 10,000 serious flaws, while Anthropic simultaneously markets Claude Security for commercial fixes, effectively profiting from both vulnerability detection and remediation.
Key Points
- Project Glasswing now includes 150 partners across 15 countries.
- Over 10,000 serious vulnerabilities have been identified by partners.
- Claude Mythos Preview is the tool used for scanning critical infrastructure.
- Anthropic profits from both vulnerability detection and commercial fixes.
- The initiative aims to enhance global cybersecurity efforts.
Article Excerpt
From source RSS / original summaryAnthropic is scaling up Project Glasswing with 150 new partners across more than 15 countries, all using Claude Mythos Preview to scan critical infrastructure for security flaws. Partners already on board have found over 10,000 serious vulnerabilities. At the same time, Anthropic is selling a commercial fix with Claude Security, profiting from both sides of the problem. The article Anthropic scales Project Glasswing to 150 partners across 15 countries to hunt critical software flaws appeared first on The Decoder.
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from The Decoder
See more →
An AI model programmed nonstop for 19 days on a single MirrorCode task that cost $2,600 to run
Epoch AI's MirrorCode benchmark reveals Claude Opus 4.7 as the leader with a 56% solve rate, reconstructing a 16,000-line toolkit in 14 hours. Despite this, all models tested struggle with the most complex tasks, highlighting limitations in current AI capabilities. The single task consumed $2,600 over 19 days, raising questions about cost-effectiveness in AI development.
