OpenAI uncovers Russian and Iranian influence ops that planted fake stories in real news outlets
Quick Answer
OpenAI has identified and banned accounts involved in Russian and Iranian influence operations that planted fake stories in legitimate media.
Quick Take
The Russian operation, 'Dark Clark,' aimed to discredit Ukraine in Latin America, while the Iranian operation, 'Bogus Bylines,' produced nearly 100 articles on the US-Iran conflict across global outlets.
Key Points
- The Russian operation 'Dark Clark' targeted Latin America to destabilize local politics.
- OpenAI rated 'Dark Clark' as category 5 on the Breakout Scale due to political reactions.
- The Iranian operation 'Bogus Bylines' used seven fake journalists for nearly 100 articles.
- Both operations primarily utilized AI for internal reporting and language adaptation.
- Fake audio and documents from 'Dark Clark' triggered official denials in Ecuador and Peru.
📖 Reader Mode
~1 min readOpenAI exposed a Russian and an Iranian influence operation and banned the ChatGPT accounts involved. Both used fake identities to plant content in legitimate media rather than running social media campaigns, according to the company's investigation report. OpenAI had previously uncovered a different Russian campaign built on social media and a fake think tank.
The Russian operation, "Dark Clark," spread disinformation across Latin America to discredit Ukraine and destabilize local politics. The actors controlled a think tank through a fictitious persona and likely roped in local staffers without their knowledge. Fabricated audio files and documents triggered fact-checks and official denials in Ecuador and Peru. OpenAI rates it category 5 out of 6 on the Breakout Scale because politicians reacted to the content, making it the first category 5 case in two and a half years of reporting.
The Iranian operation, "Bogus Bylines," used seven fake journalists to place nearly 100 articles about the US-Iran conflict in online outlets worldwide. The actors also generated social media comments, though those gained almost no traction. Both operations used AI mainly for internal reporting and to adapt propaganda to different languages.
— Originally published at the-decoder.com
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from The Decoder
See more →
An AI model programmed nonstop for 19 days on a single MirrorCode task that cost $2,600 to run
Epoch AI's MirrorCode benchmark reveals Claude Opus 4.7 as the leader with a 56% solve rate, reconstructing a 16,000-line toolkit in 14 hours. Despite this, all models tested struggle with the most complex tasks, highlighting limitations in current AI capabilities. The single task consumed $2,600 over 19 days, raising questions about cost-effectiveness in AI development.
