Large language models reorganize representational geometry during in-context learning
Quick Take
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 exhibit in-context learning (ICL) by reorganizing representational geometry, enhancing task performance without parameter updates. This study reveals that ICL effectiveness correlates with the underlying classification task's representational structure, suggesting a geometric constraint on learning capabilities.
Key Points
- ICL allows LLMs to adapt to new tasks without parameter updates.
- Performance correlates with the representational structure of classification tasks.
- Successful ICL involves geometric reorganization for better separability.
- Findings suggest a prototype-like algorithm underlies LLM behavior.
- Study establishes representational geometry as a constraint on ICL.
Article Content
From source RSS / original summaryarXiv:2605. 28854v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) exhibit remarkable flexibility: they can adapt to novel tasks from in-context examples without any parameter updates, a capability known as in-context learning (ICL). Prior work on synthetic tasks has shown that ICL can implement specific algorithms, demonstrating architectural competence, and mechanistic analyses have identified key circuits that support this behavior.
However, because in-context computation -- regardless of its algorithmic form -- relies on transformations in high-dimensional representation space, it remains unclear how the geometry of that space shapes ICL effectiveness. Motivated by the neuroscience view of classification as the untangling of neural representations, we hypothesize that ICL depends on the successful online untangling of task-relevant representations.
To test this idea, we study how LLMs classify in-context examples whose labels are defined by the model's own internal representations with known structure. We show that ICL performance correlates systematically with the representational structure of the underlying classification task and that successful ICL is accompanied by geometric reorganization that increases online separability.
We further find that LLM behavior is well described by a prototype-like algorithm that integrates evidence while reshaping representations to support classification. These findings offer a geometric account of ICL in pretrained LLMs, establish representational geometry as a mechanistic constraint on ICL, and quantify the gap between what pretrained representations afford and what in-context learning can exploit.
Reader Mode unavailable (could not extract clean content).
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from arXiv cs.CL
See more →Time to REFLECT: Can We Trust LLM Judges for Evidence-based Research Agents?
The reliability of LLM judges for evaluating deep research agents is critically assessed using the REFLECT benchmark.