Google keeps losing top AI researchers to rivals
Quick Answer
Google is losing prominent AI researchers to competitors, impacting its innovation and talent pool.
Quick Take
This trend raises concerns about the company's ability to maintain its leadership in AI development amidst fierce competition from rivals like OpenAI and Microsoft.
Key Points
- Key AI researchers are leaving Google for rivals, affecting its talent pool.
- Competitors like OpenAI and Microsoft are attracting top talent.
- This trend may hinder Google's AI innovation and development capabilities.
- The loss of researchers could impact Google's competitive edge in AI.
📖 Reader Mode
~1 min read
Jun 25, 2026
Google appears to be hemorrhaging key AI researchers to competitors. Bloomberg reports that Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel are planning to join Anthropic. Both are considered important figures behind Google's Gemini AI model. Adler worked on AI-powered coding, Pritzel on training AI systems. Just days earlier, Nobel laureate John Jumper announced his move to Anthropic, and Gemini lead Noam Shazeer left for OpenAI.
The departures spooked investors and dragged down Alphabet's stock. One likely reason for the exodus: Anthropic and OpenAI are both approaching IPOs and can offer employees lucrative equity packages. A SignalFire analysis found that Deepmind engineers switch to Anthropic eleven times more often than the other way around. Google Deepmind CEO Demis Hassabis pushed back at an event in Cannes, saying Google has the deepest research bench of any AI lab.
— Originally published at the-decoder.com
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from The Decoder
See more →
An AI model programmed nonstop for 19 days on a single MirrorCode task that cost $2,600 to run
Epoch AI's MirrorCode benchmark reveals Claude Opus 4.7 as the leader with a 56% solve rate, reconstructing a 16,000-line toolkit in 14 hours. Despite this, all models tested struggle with the most complex tasks, highlighting limitations in current AI capabilities. The single task consumed $2,600 over 19 days, raising questions about cost-effectiveness in AI development.
