Fusing Stylometric and Embedding Systems to Estimate Authorship Likelihood Ratios in Japanese
Quick Answer
This study pioneers the application of likelihood ratios in authorship attribution for Japanese texts, demonstrating that a fused system of stylometric features and embedding methods significantly enhances performance, achieving a log-likelihood-ratio cost of 0.32484.
Quick Take
This study pioneers the application of likelihood ratios in authorship attribution for Japanese texts, demonstrating that a fused system of stylometric features and embedding methods significantly enhances performance, achieving a log-likelihood-ratio cost of 0.32484. The results indicate improved calibration and discriminability, marking a notable advancement in forensic text analysis.
Key Points
- First application of likelihood ratios for Japanese digital text authorship analysis.
- Fused system achieved a log-likelihood-ratio cost of 0.32484.
- Improved calibration and discriminability in authorship attribution.
- Study used ~1,000-character excerpts from blogs for evaluation.
- Demonstrates feasibility of likelihood ratios in non-English texts.
Paper Resources
Article Content
From source RSS / original summaryarXiv:2606. 13991v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The likelihood ratio framework is widely recognized as the logically and legally sound basis for evidential analysis across forensic sciences, and its importance is increasingly acknowledged in analyses of authorship in textual evidence. To date, however, its application has been confined to English-language texts.
Meanwhile, authorship attribution has traditionally relied on a diverse array of stylometric features, even as the rise of pre-trained large language models enables new contextual-embedding approaches. Combining these diverse approaches through fusion promises enhanced performance, yet it has not been applied to integrate stylometric-feature systems with embedding-based systems within the likelihood ratio paradigm.
This study is the first to apply likelihood ratio-based forensic text comparison to Japanese digital texts, using ~1,000-character excerpts from blogs, to 1) evaluate system performance and likelihood ratio magnitudes and 2) assess the impact of fusing stylometric-feature systems with embedding-based systems.
The results demonstrate that the fused system maintains excellent calibration while 1) increasing consistent-with-fact likelihood ratio magnitudes; 2) decreasing contrary-to-fact likelihood ratio magnitudes and 3) improving overall discriminability. The best-performing fusion achieved a log-likelihood-ratio cost of 0. 32484, illustrating both the feasibility of likelihood ratio framework for Japanese and the benefits of fusion across heterogeneous systems.
Reader Mode unavailable (could not extract clean content).
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from arXiv cs.CL
See more →Time to REFLECT: Can We Trust LLM Judges for Evidence-based Research Agents?
The REFLECT benchmark reveals that current LLM judges are unreliable, achieving below 55% accuracy in evaluating reasoning and evidence use, highlighting the need for improved evaluation methods for deep research agents.