TCAR-Gen: Temporal Graph Retrieval with Evidence Fusion for Knowledge-Grounded Generation
Quick Answer
TCAR-Gen introduces a novel framework for knowledge-grounded generation, achieving 0.3738 Recall@5 on the Victorian Crime Diaries benchmark, outperforming existing models like Vanilla RAG and GraphRAG.
Quick Take
TCAR-Gen introduces a novel framework for knowledge-grounded generation, achieving 0.3738 Recall@5 on the Victorian Crime Diaries benchmark, outperforming existing models like Vanilla and GraphRAG. It integrates query-conditioned graph neural networks and temporal evidence fusion, crucial for effective temporal reasoning in complex queries.
Key Points
- TCAR-Gen combines graph neural networks and temporal evidence fusion for improved reasoning.
- Achieves 0.3738 Recall@5, outperforming Vanilla RAG and GraphRAG models.
- Critical components include context graph, temporal penalty mechanism, and query conditioning.
- Maintains robust retrieval coverage across various language model sizes.
- Explicit temporal modeling is essential for accurate, reasoning-intensive question answering.
Paper Resources
Article Content
From source RSS / original summaryarXiv:2606. 00029v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: systems struggle with temporal reasoning and evidence fusion when answering complex questions over historical criminal case narratives. Existing approaches either retrieve independently of query semantics or fail to integrate multiple evidence sources coherently.
We propose Temporal Context Augmented Retrieval Generation (TCAR-Gen), a framework that combines query-conditioned graph neural networks, temporal evidence fusion, and chain-of-trees reasoning to ground answer generation in retrieved evidence. On the Victorian Crime Diaries benchmark, TCAR-Gen achieves 0. 3738 Recall@5, outperforming Vanilla RAG, Temporal RAG, GraphRAG-C, and GraphRAG-T across seven query types including multi-hop reasoning and counterfactual questions.
Ablation studies reveal that the context graph, temporal penalty mechanism, and query conditioning are critical components. Cross-model evaluation across five language model (GPT-OSS 20B to TinyLlama 1. 1B) demonstrates that TCAR-Gen maintains robust retrieval coverage at smaller model scales, though generation quality degrades substantially with reduced model capacity.
Our work shows that explicit temporal modelling and multi-branch evidence fusion are essential for faithful, reasoning-intensive question answering over knowledge-grounded corpora.
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from arXiv cs.CL
See more →Letting the Data Speak: Extracting Keywords from Crowdsourced Collections with AI
The study evaluates three NLP approaches—Named Entity Recognition, Keyword Extraction, and Topic Modelling—using the Their Finest Hour Online Archive to automate keyword extraction from crowdsourced WWII collections. Findings suggest that while NLP methods show promise, no single approach is sufficient, and ethical considerations in automated keyword extraction are crucial for responsible stewardship.