Anthropic may keep supplying Claude to the NSA despite being flagged as a supply chain risk by the Pentagon
Quick Answer
Anthropic is set to continue supplying its AI model Claude to the NSA, despite being flagged as a supply chain risk by the Pentagon.
Quick Take
Anthropic is set to continue supplying its AI model Claude to the NSA, despite being flagged as a supply chain risk by the Pentagon. This decision is influenced by the NSA's lack of access to Nvidia's latest Grace Blackwell chips, while Anthropic's 'Mythos' model operates on older hardware. Notably, the contentious 'any lawful use' clause has been excluded from the current agreement.
Key Points
- Anthropic continues supplying Claude to the NSA despite supply chain risk designation.
- NSA lacks access to Nvidia's latest Grace Blackwell chips.
- Anthropic's 'Mythos' model runs on older hardware.
- The 'any lawful use' clause is not part of the current deal.
- This decision may affect future AI supply chain assessments.
Article Excerpt
From source RSS / original summaryAnthropic will likely keep supplying AI models to the NSA despite being labeled a "supply chain risk. " Intelligence agencies lack Nvidia's latest Grace Blackwell chips, and Anthropic's "Mythos" model reportedly runs on older hardware too. The controversial "any lawful use" clause that derailed earlier talks is not part of the deal. The article Anthropic may keep supplying Claude to the NSA despite being flagged as a supply chain risk by the Pentagon appeared first on The Decoder.
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from The Decoder
See more →
An AI model programmed nonstop for 19 days on a single MirrorCode task that cost $2,600 to run
Epoch AI's MirrorCode benchmark reveals Claude Opus 4.7 as the leader with a 56% solve rate, reconstructing a 16,000-line toolkit in 14 hours. Despite this, all models tested struggle with the most complex tasks, highlighting limitations in current AI capabilities. The single task consumed $2,600 over 19 days, raising questions about cost-effectiveness in AI development.
