Microsoft trained its MAI models on unlicensed web data despite promising "enterprise grade, clean and commercially licensed data"
Quick Answer
Microsoft's MAI models were trained on unlicensed web data, contradicting its claims of using only 'clean and commercially licensed data.' This practice mirrors that of other AI companies, relying on fair use while placing the onus on website owners to block crawlers.
Key Points
- Microsoft's MAI models utilize unlicensed data sources like Common Crawl.
- The company claims to provide 'enterprise grade' data but does not adhere to this.
- Microsoft's approach shifts the responsibility to site owners to block data crawlers.
- This practice is common among AI labs, raising ethical concerns.
Source Excerpt
Microsoft sells its training approach as different from other AI companies. It isn't. The company trained its new MAI models partly on unlicensed web data like Common Crawl, despite claiming they used only "clean and commercially licensed data. " Like every other AI lab, Microsoft leans on fair use and puts the burden on site owners to block its crawlers.
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from The Decoder
See more →
An AI model programmed nonstop for 19 days on a single MirrorCode task that cost $2,600 to run
Epoch AI's MirrorCode benchmark reveals Claude Opus 4.7 as the leader with a 56% solve rate, reconstructing a 16,000-line toolkit in 14 hours. Despite this, all models tested struggle with the most complex tasks, highlighting limitations in current AI capabilities. The single task consumed $2,600 over 19 days, raising questions about cost-effectiveness in AI development.
