DLLM-JEPA: Joint Embedding Predictive Architectures for Masked Diffusion Language Models
Quick Answer
This paper shows that DLLM-JEPA integrates Joint Embedding Predictive Architectures with masked-diffusion language models, reducing training FLOPs by 33% compared to LLM-JEPA.
Quick Take
DLLM-JEPA integrates Joint Embedding Predictive Architectures with masked-diffusion language models, reducing training FLOPs by 33% compared to LLM-JEPA. It achieves significant accuracy improvements across various tasks, including +18.7 pp on LLaDA-8B GSM8K and +11.4 pp on Dream-7B GSM8K, while maintaining accuracy.
Key Points
- DLLM-JEPA eliminates the need for explicit multi-view data in training.
- Achieves up to +18.7 pp accuracy on LLaDA-8B GSM8K benchmark.
- Reduces training costs by requiring only a single gradient-carrying forward pass.
- Exhibits improved performance across various architectures and tasks.
- Demonstrates a dual-win property by lowering held-out Wikitext loss.
Paper Resources
Article Content
From source RSS / original summaryarXiv:2606. 00091v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Joint Embedding Predictive Architectures (JEPAs) have reshaped self-supervised representation learning in vision. The recent LLM-JEPA ported JEPA to autoregressive language models but inherited two steep costs from the causal-attention substrate: it demands explicit multi-view data (e. g. , text-code pairs), and it requires two gradient-carrying forward passes per step.
We introduce DLLM-JEPA, which pairs JEPA with masked-diffusion language models to eliminate both costs at once. The bidirectional attention of diffusion models yields two semantically distinct views of the same input via different masking rates -- no explicit pairs needed -- and supports a single gradient-carrying forward pass, cutting training FLOPs by 33% relative to LLM-JEPA. DLLM-JEPA improves over diffusion-only fine-tuning in every (task, architecture) combination we evaluate: up to +18.
7 pp on LLaDA-8B GSM8K and +11. 4 pp on Dream-7B GSM8K, with consistent positive gains on Spider, NL-RX-SYNTH, and Django. Beyond accuracy, DLLM-JEPA exhibits a dual-win property: on LLaDA-8B with the Wide-t configuration, it simultaneously raises GSM8K accuracy (67. 1 vs. 65. 2, +1. 8 pp), drives held-out Wikitext loss below the pre-trained base, and preserves accuracy at base level across three fine-tuning seeds -- whereas an L2-to-base parameter anchor matches baseline accuracy with no task gain.
Layer-wise probing reveals the mechanism: a geometric-functional drift dissociation in which the fine-tuned backbone moves further from the pre-trained weights than the baseline yet forgets less on held-out Wikitext, with the amplification concentrated in middle transformer layers. The pattern appears on Dream-7B as well, indicating the phenomenon is not specific to a single backbone.
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from arXiv cs.CL
See more →Letting the Data Speak: Extracting Keywords from Crowdsourced Collections with AI
The study evaluates three NLP approaches—Named Entity Recognition, Keyword Extraction, and Topic Modelling—using the Their Finest Hour Online Archive to automate keyword extraction from crowdsourced WWII collections. Findings suggest that while NLP methods show promise, no single approach is sufficient, and ethical considerations in automated keyword extraction are crucial for responsible stewardship.