Human-in-the-Loop Multi-Agent Ventilator Decision Support with Contextual Bandit Preference Learning
Quick Answer
This paper shows that The Ventilator Decision Support System (VDSS) enhances ventilator management by integrating human feedback with a contextual bandit approach, improving recommendation acceptability and reducing interaction rounds in ICU settings.
Quick Take
The Ventilator Decision Support System (VDSS) enhances ventilator management by integrating human feedback with a contextual bandit approach, improving recommendation acceptability and reducing interaction rounds in ICU settings. This framework allows for personalized decision-making while providing traceable evidence for clinician review.
Key Points
- VDSS uses a human-in-the-loop approach for personalized ventilator decision-making.
- Employs a contextual bandit for online adaptation of clinician preferences.
- Structured rejection feedback minimizes unproductive iterations during decision-making.
- Retrospective ICU trajectory analysis shows higher acceptability of recommendations.
- Facilitates improved human-AI collaboration in clinical environments.
Paper Resources
Article Content
From source RSS / original summaryarXiv:2605. 23320v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Ventilator decision support requires sequential decisions that track evolving physiology and disease trajectories while respecting safety boundaries and clinician specific tuning styles. Rule based approaches rarely generalize personalization, and end to end reinforcement learning or single large language model systems remain difficult to control and audit.
We propose the Ventilator Decision Support System (VDSS), a human in the loop multi agent framework that coordinates modular decision components through contract driven structured interfaces and produces traceable evidence for review. VDSS performs online preference adaptation with a contextual bandit, updating clinician specific preferences from the final accepted decision at each adjustment cycle and using them to guide subsequent recommendations.
Structured rejection feedback triggers targeted replanning to reduce unproductive iterations and improve interaction stability. Retrospective ICU trajectory replay with expert review indicates higher recommendation acceptability and fewer interaction rounds to reach an acceptable plan, supporting clinically deployable human AI collaboration.
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from arXiv cs.AI
See more →Adversarial Social Epistemology for Assemblies of Humans and Large Language Models
The paper introduces Adversarial Social Epistemology (ASE) to analyze how agents manipulate trust in public communications, highlighting mechanisms that undermine the reliability of testimony and inference. It critiques existing frameworks like epistemic bubbles and misinformation diffusion, proposing a new language for understanding trust breaches and auditing inferential chains in densely interactive environments involving humans and large language models.