RCWT: Measuring Task-Budget Displacement from Coordination Content in LLM Calls
Quick Answer
This paper shows that The RCWT protocol measures task-budget displacement in LLM calls, revealing that coordination tokens significantly impact performance.
Quick Take
The RCWT protocol measures task-budget displacement in LLM calls, revealing that coordination tokens significantly impact performance. In tests with GPT-4.1-mini, Claude Haiku 4.5, and Gemini 2.5 Flash, models maintained accuracy up to a 95% coordination ratio, indicating that task-budget displacement is a key factor rather than coordination volume alone causing semantic interference.
Key Points
- RCWT varies coordination content while controlling total budget and task family.
- Three commercial models showed baseline performance degradation with increased coordination tokens.
- Models maintained accuracy with intact task evidence despite high coordination ratios.
- RCWT serves as a measurement primitive for context-allocation budgeting.
- Findings suggest task-budget displacement impacts LLM performance significantly.
Paper Resources
📖 Reader Mode
~2 min readAbstract:Multi-agent and memory-augmented LLM systems often place coordination content, shared state, prior discussion, tool outputs, summaries, and role instructions, inside the same finite prompt used for the current task. This creates a practical allocation problem: every token spent on coordination is unavailable to task instructions or evidence when a call is assembled under a fixed context budget. We introduce the Roundtable Context Window Test (RCWT), a controlled protocol for measuring this task-budget displacement effect. RCWT varies coordination content while controlling total budget, position order, task family, and scoring. In the main context-dependent recall task at $W=4096$, three commercial models remain near baseline through moderate overhead and then degrade sharply once residual reference evidence falls to a few hundred tokens. Window-scaling summaries are consistent with a task-specific residual-budget interpretation rather than a fixed percentage threshold, but we treat this as descriptive evidence rather than a universal law. To test whether the fixed-budget cliff persists when task evidence remains intact, we add an intact-task ablation: the full task/reference block is kept present while coordination tokens increase by expanding total prompt length. In that setting, all tested calls return every scored field correctly across GPT-4.1-mini, Claude Haiku 4.5, and Gemini 2.5 Flash up to a 95\% coordination ratio. This ablation narrows the claim: the main RCWT cliff is best read as task-budget displacement, not as proof that coordination volume alone causes semantic interference in the original open-ended task. RCWT is therefore a measurement primitive for context-allocation budgeting, not a complete theory of multi-agent benefit or session-level coordination.
| Comments: | 10 pages, 1 figure |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2607.12216 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2607.12216v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.12216 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Rodrigo Da Motta Cabral De Carvalho [view email]
[v1]
Mon, 13 Jul 2026 23:31:44 UTC (82 KB)
— Originally published at arxiv.org
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from arXiv cs.CL
See more →Letting the Data Speak: Extracting Keywords from Crowdsourced Collections with AI
The study evaluates three NLP approaches—Named Entity Recognition, Keyword Extraction, and Topic Modelling—using the Their Finest Hour Online Archive to automate keyword extraction from crowdsourced WWII collections. Findings suggest that while NLP methods show promise, no single approach is sufficient, and ethical considerations in automated keyword extraction are crucial for responsible stewardship.