Rivian sues the US government for ‘full refund’ of Trump tariffs
Quick Answer
Rivian has sued the U.S.
Quick Take
government for a full refund of tariffs paid under Trump's administration, which the Supreme Court deemed unconstitutional. The automaker anticipates a refund in the tens of millions as it prepares to launch its R2 SUV, aiming for profitability by 2028 while investing heavily in autonomous vehicle development.
Key Points
- Rivian's lawsuit targets the U.S. government and Customs for tariff refunds.
- The company expects a refund of tens of millions from the unconstitutional tariffs.
- Rivian aims to ship 20,000-25,000 R2 SUVs by year-end.
- The lawsuit seeks to declare tariffs 'contrary to law' and secure refunds with interest.
- Rivian raised $1.3 billion to bolster its cash reserves amid ongoing developments.
DeepSignal Analysis
What happened
Rivian has initiated a lawsuit against the U.S. government seeking a full refund of tariffs imposed during the Trump administration, which were later ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. The automaker anticipates receiving tens of millions of dollars as a refund while preparing to launch its R2 SUV and aiming for profitability by 2028.
Key evidence
- Rivian's lawsuit, filed in the U.S. Court of International Trade, targets the U.S. government and U.S. Customs and Border Protection, which collected the tariffs.
- Rivian CFO Claire McDonough indicated that the company expects a refund in the tens of millions of dollars from the tariffs paid under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
- The Cato Institute reported that $71 billion had been processed for refunds, highlighting potential obstacles for companies like Rivian in securing their refunds.
Why it matters
This lawsuit underscores the ongoing financial implications of tariffs on companies and the complexities involved in seeking refunds. Rivian's financial health is crucial as it invests heavily in autonomous vehicle development and aims to launch its R2 SUV. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for other companies seeking similar refunds.
📖 Reader Mode
~3 min readRivian has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. government in an attempt to claw back a “full refund” on tariffs it paid under President Trump’s “Liberation Day” taxes, which the Supreme Court later ruled unconstitutional.
The automaker joins a long line of companies seeking such refunds. In April, Rivian CFO Claire McDonough said she expected the company stood to reap a refund in the “tens of millions of dollars.”
Rivian’s action comes as the company is in the middle of rolling out its first mass-market SUV, the R2. It expects to ship around 20,000-25,000 of them by the end of this year, and help the company finally reach profitability. Reaching that goal may not happen until 2028, though, as Rivian is plowing a lot of money into developing autonomous vehicles at the moment. The company recently sold shares to raise around $1.3 billion to help pad out its cash balance in the meantime.
The lawsuit, filed on Thursday in the U.S. Court of International Trade, names the U.S. government, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and its commissioner Rodney Scott as defendants. CBP collected the tariffs on behalf of the Trump administration, which tried to justify them under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).
In a statement to TechCrunch, CBP said that over $121 billion in both “potential and certified refunds have been accepted for processing .” The agency did not comment specifically on the lawsuit.
Earlier this month, the Cato Institute wrote that $71 billion had been paid out, which “suggests that frictions built into” the refund process created “obstacles for importers seeking refunds.”
According to Rivian’s lawsuit, the company wants a guarantee that it will get its money — and the proper amount — back from the government.
“Although the Supreme Court invalidated the tariffs, this separate action remains necessary because importers that have paid IEEPA tariffs, including Plaintiffs, are not guaranteed a refund of amounts previously paid based on the Supreme Court’s decision,” Rivian’s lawyers wrote in the complaint.
Rivian did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Rivian CEO RJ Scaringe told Reuters last year after the tariffs were imposed that he expected the cost of each vehicle to rise by “a couple of thousand dollars” as a result. By the end of 2025, he said the company had mitigated the impact to “low hundreds of dollars.”
“The resulting environment of retaliatory trade or other practices or additional trade restrictions or barriers has harmed, and could continue to harm, our ability to obtain necessary raw materials, components and equipment and could harm our ability to sell our products and services at prices customers are willing to pay,” the company wrote in a regulatory filing earlier this year.
Rivian is asking the trade court to declare the tariffs “contrary to law,” issue a refund with interest, and pay any associated court fees.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
Sean O’Kane is a reporter who has spent a decade covering the rapidly-evolving business and technology of the transportation industry, including Tesla and the many startups chasing Elon Musk. Most recently, he was a reporter at Bloomberg News where he helped break stories about some of the most notorious EV SPAC flops. He previously worked at The Verge, where he also covered consumer technology, hosted many short- and long-form videos, performed product and editorial photography, and once nearly passed out in a Red Bull Air Race plane.
You can contact or verify outreach from Sean by emailing sean.okane@techcrunch.com or via encrypted message at okane.01 on Signal.
— Originally published at techcrunch.com
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from TechCrunch
See more →
AI chip startup Etched defies skeptics, hits $10.3B valuation from big-name investors
AI chip startup Etched has achieved a $10.3 billion valuation after a $300 million Series C funding round, led by Sequoia and supported by notable investors like Andreessen Horowitz. The company claims to have developed innovative low-voltage chips for AI inference, significantly enhancing performance and reducing costs, with $1 billion in orders already booked.
