TriVAL: A Tri-Validation Framework for Faithful Automatic Optimization Modeling
Quick Answer
TriVAL introduces a tri-validation framework for automatic optimization modeling, enhancing accuracy by validating at semantic, mathematical, and code stages.
Quick Take
It outperforms existing methods on the NL4COP benchmark, which features 150 complex instances across 50 problem types.
Key Points
- TriVAL performs validation at three stages: semantic, mathematical, and code generation.
- The framework uses a construct-validate-revise loop to ensure modeling accuracy.
- NL4COP benchmark includes 150 instances with complex decision logic and constraints.
- TriVAL consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods on challenging optimization problems.
- The approach helps preserve faithfulness throughout the optimization modeling process.
Paper Resources
Article Content
From source RSS / original summaryarXiv:2605. 23966v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Optimization modeling serves as the pivotal bridge between natural-language problem descriptions and optimization solvers, and remains a cornerstone for bringing operations research (OR) into real-world decision making. Recent advances in (LLMs) have driven significant progress in automatic optimization modeling.
However, existing methods still lack explicit validation during the modeling process, allowing errors introduced in earlier stages to carry through the pipeline and ultimately reduce final modeling accuracy. To address this challenge, we introduce TriVAL, a tri-validation framework that performs explicit validation at three stages of automatic optimization modeling: semantic specification, mathematical formulation, and code generation.
At each stage, TriVAL follows a construct-validate-revise loop that assesses the current result against stage-specific criteria and revises it when needed. This design helps identify and correct errors before they accumulate across stages, helping preserve faithfulness throughout the modeling process.
To evaluate automatic optimization modeling on more challenging combinatorial problems, we further introduce NL4COP, a benchmark of 150 instances across 50 diverse problem types with more complex decision logic, more tightly coupled constraints, and more demanding modeling requirements than existing benchmarks. Experiments on NL4COP and established benchmarks show that TriVAL consistently outperforms state-ofthe-art methods, with the largest gains on the most challenging problems.
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from arXiv cs.CL
See more →TriAgent: Divergence-Aware Committees for Cost-Efficient Financial Sentiment Analysis
TriAgent introduces a cost-efficient multi-agent system for financial sentiment analysis, combining VADER, FinBERT, and Qwen2.5. It achieves an F1 score of ~0.87 with significant savings of $9.3M/year at a 10M-user scale compared to GPT-4o-mini, while also detecting hallucinations with an AUC of 0.90.