TriVAL: A Tri-Validation Framework for Faithful Automatic Optimization Modeling
Quick Take
TriVAL introduces a tri-validation framework for automatic optimization modeling, enhancing accuracy by validating semantic specification, mathematical formulation, and code generation. It outperforms state-of-the-art methods on the NL4COP benchmark, which includes 150 challenging instances across 50 problem types.
Key Points
- TriVAL validates optimization modeling at three critical stages: specification, formulation, and generation.
- The framework employs a construct-validate-revise loop to ensure accuracy throughout the modeling process.
- NL4COP benchmark features 150 instances with complex decision logic and tight constraints.
- Experiments show TriVAL consistently surpasses existing methods, especially on difficult problems.
- This advancement aids operations research in real-world decision-making scenarios.
Article Content
From source RSS / original summaryarXiv:2605. 23966v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Optimization modeling serves as the pivotal bridge between natural-language problem descriptions and optimization solvers, and remains a cornerstone for bringing operations research (OR) into real-world decision making. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have driven significant progress in automatic optimization modeling.
However, existing methods still lack explicit validation during the modeling process, allowing errors introduced in earlier stages to carry through the pipeline and ultimately reduce final modeling accuracy. To address this challenge, we introduce TriVAL, a tri-validation framework that performs explicit validation at three stages of automatic optimization modeling: semantic specification, mathematical formulation, and code generation.
At each stage, TriVAL follows a construct-validate-revise loop that assesses the current result against stage-specific criteria and revises it when needed. This design helps identify and correct errors before they accumulate across stages, helping preserve faithfulness throughout the modeling process.
To evaluate automatic optimization modeling on more challenging combinatorial problems, we further introduce NL4COP, a benchmark of 150 instances across 50 diverse problem types with more complex decision logic, more tightly coupled constraints, and more demanding modeling requirements than existing benchmarks. Experiments on NL4COP and established benchmarks show that TriVAL consistently outperforms state-ofthe-art methods, with the largest gains on the most challenging problems.
Reader Mode unavailable (could not extract clean content).
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from arXiv cs.CL
See more →Time to REFLECT: Can We Trust LLM Judges for Evidence-based Research Agents?
The reliability of LLM judges for evaluating deep research agents is critically assessed using the REFLECT benchmark.