Agentic Trading: When LLM Agents Meet Financial Markets
Quick Take
The paper reviews LLM-based trading agents, highlighting protocol incomparability and reproducibility challenges.
Key Points
- 77 studies analyzed for LLM trading agents.
- Only 2 out of 19 studies report consistent protocols.
- Architectural experimentation is growing, but evaluation remains a bottleneck.
📖 Reader Mode
~2 min readAbstract:A growing body of work explores how Large Language Models (LLMs) can be embedded in trading systems as agents that perceive market information, retrieve context, reason about decisions, emit tradable actions, and adapt under market feedback. This paper reframes LLM-based trading agents as expert-system decision pipelines and presents an audit-oriented evidence map of 77 included studies in a protocol-coded snapshot screened through 2026-03-09. A primary empirical subset (n=19) satisfies the minimum boundary of Action Output plus Closed-Loop Evaluation; the remaining 58 included studies are retained as background and design context. The central empirical finding is protocol incomparability: within the primary subset, only 2/19 studies report extractable time-consistent split protocols, 1/19 reports an explicit transaction-cost model, 1/19 documents universe or survivorship handling, 11/19 report execution timing or semantics, 15/19 are coded as R0, and no study reaches R3 reproducibility. We therefore use Architecture-Capability-Adaptation as a working analytical lens rather than a validated taxonomy, and we foreground the evidence ledger, reproducibility audit, and reporting checklist as the main contributions. The resulting survey shows that architectural experimentation is expanding rapidly, while comparable evaluation protocols, execution semantics, and reproducible artifacts remain the field's immediate bottlenecks.
| Comments: | 59 pages, 15 figures, 27 tables |
| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.19337 [cs.AI] |
| (or arXiv:2605.19337v1 [cs.AI] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.19337 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Wang Taotao [view email]
[v1]
Tue, 19 May 2026 04:20:07 UTC (12,456 KB)
— Originally published at arxiv.org
More from arXiv cs.AI
See more →From Prompts to Protocols: An AI Agent for Laboratory Automation
An AI agent integrates large language models for automating laboratory protocols, enhancing efficiency and accuracy.