CogniConsole: Externalizing Inference-Time Control as a Formal Abstraction for Reliable LLM Interactions
Quick Answer
CogniConsole introduces a structured interface for inference-time control in LLMs, significantly reducing output variance and failure rates through enhanced scaffolding.
Quick Take
CogniConsole introduces a structured interface for inference-time control in LLMs, significantly reducing output variance and failure rates through enhanced scaffolding. Empirical results from 489 probes indicate that many failure modes stem from under-specified control rather than model capability, suggesting a shift in LLM design focus.
Key Points
- CogniConsole externalizes inference-time control into a structured interface.
- 489 controllability-oriented probes demonstrate reduced output variance.
- Enhanced scaffolding leads to lower failure rates in LLM interactions.
- Failure modes like context drift arise from under-specified control.
- This work advocates for treating inference-time control as a key design abstraction.
Paper Resources
📖 Reader Mode
~2 min readAbstract:Reliability in large language model (LLM) systems is typically framed as a function of model capability. We challenge this by demonstrating that reliability is significantly influenced by \emph{inference-time control} -- the computational layer governing task framing and context selection. We introduce \emph{CogniConsole}, an architectural instantiation that externalizes this control into a structured interface combining programmatic coordination with bounded prompt-based reasoning. Through \emph{controllability-oriented probes} ($N=489$) in a multi-step interactive environment, we show that increasing structural scaffolding -- from unstructured to fully scaffolded -- \textbf{systematically reduces output variance and failure rates under a fixed model architecture}. Our results indicate that many observed failure modes, such as context drift and inconsistent constraint adherence, arise from under-specified control rather than insufficient capability. This work provides an empirical basis for treating inference-time control as a first-class abstraction, opening new directions for designing and evaluating LLM systems beyond scaling alone.
| Comments: | Revised version focusing on the CogniConsole system architecture and empirical evaluation of inference-time control probes (N=489) |
| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC) |
| ACM classes: | H.5; I.2 |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2607.08774 [cs.AI] |
| (or arXiv:2607.08774v1 [cs.AI] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.08774 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
Submission history
From: Vanessa Figueiredo [view email]
[v1]
Tue, 21 Apr 2026 17:21:06 UTC (566 KB)
— Originally published at arxiv.org
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from arXiv cs.AI
See more →Adversarial Social Epistemology for Assemblies of Humans and Large Language Models
The paper introduces Adversarial Social Epistemology (ASE) to analyze how agents manipulate trust in public communications, highlighting mechanisms that undermine the reliability of testimony and inference. It critiques existing frameworks like epistemic bubbles and misinformation diffusion, proposing a new language for understanding trust breaches and auditing inferential chains in densely interactive environments involving humans and large language models.