AI startup Lindy ditched Claude entirely for Deepseek, saving millions as cost pressure mounts on Anthropic
Quick Answer
AI startup Lindy has completely transitioned from using Claude to Deepseek, driven by rising AI costs that surpassed personnel expenses.
Quick Take
CEO Flo Crivello emphasizes this shift as essential for the company's survival amidst increasing financial pressures on Anthropic.
Key Points
- Lindy's switch to Deepseek resulted in significant cost savings.
- AI costs had previously exceeded personnel expenses for Lindy.
- The transition is described as essential for business survival.
- CEO Flo Crivello highlights the financial pressures on Anthropic.
📖 Reader Mode
~1 min read
Jun 26, 2026
Anthropic better get moving on its IPO. OpenAI apparently already missed its optimal window and postponed. Now even Anthropic's explosive growth could come under pressure as companies tighten AI spending and turn to cheaper Chinese alternatives.
AI startup Lindy is a case in point: CEO Flo Crivello ditched Claude entirely for Deepseek, hosted by a US company on US soil. The cost curve "crashed to the ground," saving millions, he told CNBC. AI costs for the 25-person startup had been "unsustainable," exceeding personnel costs. Crivello said he'd switch back if Anthropic cut prices: "It's a matter of survival for the business."
A recent analysis by Snowflake's CEO showed that affordable Chinese models like GLM-5.2 don't quite match Claude but are competitive and easily win on the price-performance ratio depending on the task. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently said that AI cost became a "huge issue" for companies with the recent switch to agentic systems burning through tokens.
— Originally published at the-decoder.com
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from The Decoder
See more →
An AI model programmed nonstop for 19 days on a single MirrorCode task that cost $2,600 to run
Epoch AI's MirrorCode benchmark reveals Claude Opus 4.7 as the leader with a 56% solve rate, reconstructing a 16,000-line toolkit in 14 hours. Despite this, all models tested struggle with the most complex tasks, highlighting limitations in current AI capabilities. The single task consumed $2,600 over 19 days, raising questions about cost-effectiveness in AI development.
