Improving Heart-Focused Medical Question Answering in LLMs via Variance-Aware Rubric Rewards with GRPO
Quick Answer
The study introduces a Variance-Aware Reward Framework using Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) to enhance heart-focused medical question answering in LLMs.
Quick Take
The study introduces a Variance-Aware Reward Framework using Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) to enhance heart-focused medical question answering in LLMs. The GRPO variant improved accuracy from 0.362 to 0.502 and F1 from 0.532 to 0.668 on HealthBench, outperforming the Qwen3-14B model and remaining competitive with GPT-OSS-120B.
Key Points
- GRPO enhances heart-focused medical question answering in LLMs with rubric-based supervision.
- Accuracy improved from 0.362 to 0.502 and F1 from 0.532 to 0.668.
- The model remains competitive with GPT-OSS-120B's accuracy of 0.508 and F1 of 0.674.
- Proposed framework provides richer optimization signals for sparse and multi-criteria feedback.
- Findings suggest potential for extending rubric-based rewards to other medical tasks.
Article Content
From source RSS / original summaryarXiv:2606. 05174v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong promise in healthcare applications. Yet deploying general-purpose models in real-world settings remains difficult due to data privacy constraints, inference costs, and limited suitability for edge or on-device use. These challenges motivate the development of smaller, more efficient models that require robust post-training strategies to ensure reliable medical reasoning.
In this work, we investigate Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) for post-training LLMs on heart-focused medical question answering with rubric-based supervision derived from RaR-Medicine. We propose a Variance-Aware Reward Framework that extends the Explicit Aggregation and Implicit Aggregation strategies of Rubrics as Rewards by replacing weighted binary criterion aggregation and single overall Likert-style scoring with continuous analytical reward functions derived from criterion-level rubric outcomes.
This formulation provides richer optimization signals for feedback that is sparse, multi-criteria, and difficult to verify automatically, and enables more stable on-policy reinforcement learning. On a held-out heart-related subset of HealthBench, our best GRPO variant improves accuracy from 0. 362 to 0. 502 and F1 from 0. 532 to 0. 668 relative to the Qwen3-14B base model, while remaining competitive with GPT-OSS-120B (0. 508 accuracy, 0. 674 F1).
Our findings show that carefully designed rubric-based rewards provide a practical strategy for improving heart-focused medical question answering in LLMs, with potential to extend to other rubric-based tasks.
Reader Mode unavailable (could not extract clean content).
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from arXiv cs.CL
See more →Time to REFLECT: Can We Trust LLM Judges for Evidence-based Research Agents?
The REFLECT benchmark reveals that current LLM judges are unreliable, achieving below 55% accuracy in evaluating reasoning and evidence use, highlighting the need for improved evaluation methods for deep research agents.