
Anthropic's Fable 5 is back worldwide after a two-week government ban over a jailbreak
Quick Answer
Anthropic's Fable 5 is back in global circulation after a two-week U.S.
Quick Take
government ban due to a jailbreak exploit discovered by Amazon researchers. While a new safety classifier mitigates over 99% of such exploits, it inadvertently flags benign requests, raising concerns about user experience.
Key Points
- Fable 5 was banned for two weeks due to a jailbreak vulnerability.
- Amazon researchers identified the exploit, affecting even smaller models like Claude Haiku 4.5.
- A new safety classifier blocks over 99% of jailbreak attempts.
- The classifier may incorrectly flag harmless requests, impacting user experience.
- Anthropic resumes global shipping of Fable 5 following government clearance.
📖 Reader Mode
~3 min readAfter a two-week ban, the US government is letting Anthropic ship its most powerful AI model globally again.
Fable 5 is back worldwide starting today through the Claude Platform, Claude.ai, Claude Code, and Claude Cowork. Pro, Max, Team, and select Enterprise plans include the model through July 7 at up to 50 percent of weekly usage limits. After that, it'll be billed through usage credits. Access on AWS, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Foundry will be restored "as quickly as possible."
Mythos 5, the less restricted version of the same base model, remains limited to a group of US organizations that got government approval on June 26. Anthropic says it's still working with the government to expand access to more partners in the so-called Glasswing program. Whether the EU will join remains unclear.
Anthropic confirms that the ban stemmed from a security finding by Amazon researchers. They had found a way to bypass Fable 5's safety guardrails. The model then identified several software vulnerabilities and, in one case, produced code showing how to exploit one of them.
Anthropic says it's "probably impossible" to make an AI model that can't be jailbroken
The US government and Anthropic spent two weeks investigating the vulnerability. Many less capable models could spot the same flaws Fable 5 found in the report, including Claude Opus 4.8, GPT-5.5, and Kimi K2.7. For the specific exploit demo, every model tested produced the same result, even much smaller ones like Claude Haiku 4.5.
Anthropic calls it an edge case that only involved routine defensive cybersecurity work. In response, the company trained an improved safety classifier that blocks the technique from the Amazon report in more than 99 percent of cases. When a request gets blocked, users see a notification, and the request gets routed to the older Opus 4.8 model.
The new classifier comes with a tradeoff, though. It flags harmless requests more often during everyday coding and debugging. Users had already complained the model was too restrictive during the first Fable release.

No universal jailbreak was found at the time of release. But the company admits it's "probably impossible to make any AI model fully robust (that is, impervious) to jailbreaks." That was well known before Fable 5 shipped.
The AI industry needs a shared standard for rating jailbreaks and triggering countermeasures, Anthropic argues. The company says it's building such a framework with Amazon, Microsoft, Google, and other Glasswing partners. Anthropic is also standing up a team for 24/7 monitoring of jailbreak submission channels and launched a new HackerOne program where security researchers can report potential cyber jailbreaks for Fable 5.
Anthropic wants closer government oversight of frontier models
Anthropic is expanding its work with the US government, building on their joint efforts tied to the executive order.
The company is making several commitments. Government partners will get pre-release access to models that advance capabilities in security-sensitive areas. Discovered jailbreaks or abuse patterns will be shared quickly. Anthropic will put up dedicated resources and significant compute for joint research. And the company will help build a shared industry standard for frontier model providers.
Anthropic wants all of this written into "strong regulation" and applied equally to every frontier model developer. "Government involvement in AI releases requires a durable, transparent process that gives cyber defenders and others the certainty they need about access to powerful models," the company writes.
— Originally published at the-decoder.com
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from The Decoder
See more →
An AI model programmed nonstop for 19 days on a single MirrorCode task that cost $2,600 to run
Epoch AI's MirrorCode benchmark reveals Claude Opus 4.7 as the leader with a 56% solve rate, reconstructing a 16,000-line toolkit in 14 hours. Despite this, all models tested struggle with the most complex tasks, highlighting limitations in current AI capabilities. The single task consumed $2,600 over 19 days, raising questions about cost-effectiveness in AI development.

