
Anthropic gives METR inside access to audit its AI models and safety practices
Quick Answer
Anthropic has granted METR access to audit its AI models and safety practices, providing hardware and tools to six staffers.
Quick Take
While customer data and sensitive model architecture remain confidential, METR will independently publish findings, with Anthropic able to request specific redactions. This initiative follows Anthropic's commitment to external reviews as part of the White House Accord on Super Intelligence.
Key Points
- Six METR staffers received hardware and access to Anthropic's internal tools.
- Customer data and model architecture details remain confidential.
- METR can publish findings independently, with Anthropic able to request redactions.
- Anthropic's access for METR exceeds that offered to other reviewers.
- The initiative aligns with Anthropic's commitment to external audits under the White House Accord.
📖 Reader Mode
~1 min readAnthropic has given a team from the nonprofit METR inside access to review its AI models and safety practices, the company announced. Six METR staffers received company hardware, office space, and access to internal tools, which Anthropic says puts them roughly on par with its own risk teams.
Customer data, information covered by attorney-client privilege, and details about the model architecture remain off-limits. METR will publish its findings independently. Anthropic says it can ask for redactions in certain predefined categories, but METR is free to say publicly whether it thinks those redactions were justified.
Anthropic argues that not all safety-relevant information can be made public, either because it could help attackers or because it's commercially sensitive. The METR deal goes further than what the company has offered other outside reviewers. SecureBio, Accenture, and Faculty have so far received less access and tighter limits on what they can publish, and Anthropic has started early talks with Hugging Face. The move follows Anthropic's signing of the White House Accord on Super Intelligence, which includes a commitment to working with outside reviewers.
— Originally published at the-decoder.com
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from The Decoder
See more →
An AI model programmed nonstop for 19 days on a single MirrorCode task that cost $2,600 to run
Epoch AI's MirrorCode benchmark reveals Claude Opus 4.7 as the leader with a 56% solve rate, reconstructing a 16,000-line toolkit in 14 hours. Despite this, all models tested struggle with the most complex tasks, highlighting limitations in current AI capabilities. The single task consumed $2,600 over 19 days, raising questions about cost-effectiveness in AI development.

