CANDI: Contextual Alignment for Niche Domains Question Answering
Quick Answer
CANDI-QA introduces a novel dataset for evaluating large language models (LLMs) in niche domains like medical and financial sectors, focusing on context-sensitive and user-aligned answers.
Quick Take
CANDI-QA introduces a novel dataset for evaluating large language models (LLMs) in niche domains like medical and financial sectors, focusing on context-sensitive and user-aligned answers. It categorizes questions into Information Assistance and Applied Inference, assessing over ten LLMs, including MTSS-Net, a neuro-symbolic framework. Findings reveal significant challenges in achieving contextual alignment, highlighting the need for improved integration in LLMs for high-stakes applications.
Key Points
- CANDI-QA evaluates LLMs on context-sensitive answers in specialized domains.
- Questions are categorized into Information Assistance and Applied Inference.
- Over ten language models, including MTSS-Net, were assessed for performance.
- Findings indicate significant limitations in current LLMs for niche applications.
- CANDI-QA serves as a benchmark for advancing context-aware language models.
Paper Resources
📖 Reader Mode
~2 min readAbstract:The deployment of large language models (LLMs) in specialized domains like medical diagnostics and financial advisory necessitates evaluating capabilities beyond general knowledge. Traditional question-answering benchmarks often fail to capture the nuanced contextual grounding, user awareness, and domain understanding these fields require. To address this, we introduce CANDI-QA (Contextual Alignment for Niche Domains Question Answering), a novel dataset evaluating LLMs on delivering accurate, context-sensitive, and user-aligned answers in specialized settings. CANDI-QA features expert-curated question-answer pairs structured into two categories: (1) Information Assistance Questions, which are direct, factual queries requiring precise extraction, and (2) Applied Inference Questions, which are multi-hop reasoning tasks needing situational inference to generate actionable insights. We evaluate over ten diverse language models, from compact open-source to state-of-the-art proprietary systems. As a robust baseline, we present MTSS-Net, a lightweight neuro-symbolic framework combining neural retrieval with rule-based reasoning. Our findings highlight the profound challenges of achieving contextual alignment in niche domains, revealing the limitations of current LLMs without enhanced contextual or symbolic integration. Ultimately, CANDI-QA serves as a critical benchmark for advancing research in context-aware language models, stimulating the development of robust, trustworthy AI for high-stakes domains.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2607.11891 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2607.11891v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.11891 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
Submission history
From: Madhur Thareja [view email]
[v1]
Wed, 6 May 2026 06:40:13 UTC (1,858 KB)
— Originally published at arxiv.org
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from arXiv cs.CL
See more →Letting the Data Speak: Extracting Keywords from Crowdsourced Collections with AI
The study evaluates three NLP approaches—Named Entity Recognition, Keyword Extraction, and Topic Modelling—using the Their Finest Hour Online Archive to automate keyword extraction from crowdsourced WWII collections. Findings suggest that while NLP methods show promise, no single approach is sufficient, and ethical considerations in automated keyword extraction are crucial for responsible stewardship.