
Two teams solved the same quantum crypto problem using GPT-5.6 just three hours apart
Quick Answer
Two teams independently solved the same quantum cryptography problem using OpenAI's GPT-5.6 just three hours apart, raising questions about independent discovery in AI-assisted research.
Quick Take
MIT's Seyoon Ragavan and professors Prabhanjan Ananth and Amit Sahai utilized different approaches to 'unclonable encryption' and are considering merging their findings.
Key Points
- MIT PhD student Seyoon Ragavan and two professors solved the same problem independently.
- Both teams used OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra for their research.
- They focused on 'unclonable encryption' based on quantum properties.
- The case highlights challenges in defining independent discoveries in AI research.
- Reactions to AI's impact on math range from excitement to identity loss.
📖 Reader Mode
~1 min readAI is changing how science gets done. Two researchers independently solved the same open quantum cryptography problem using OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra, submitting their papers to arXiv.org just three hours apart, Scientific American reports. MIT PhD student Seyoon Ragavan worked on one side, professors Prabhanjan Ananth (UC Santa Barbara) and Amit Sahai (UCLA) on the other.
Both used the same AI model but took different approaches to "unclonable encryption," a method that relies on quantum properties. They're now considering merging their papers. But the case raises a bigger question: when every researcher has access to the same models, what still counts as an independent discovery?
"If someone mentions an open problem, the first thing is to see if GPT solves it," Ananth says. Ragavan puts it bluntly: "The way I do research now has nothing to do with how I did research two months ago." Math in particular is feeling AI's impact, and reactions range from excitement about new possibilities to depression over a lost sense of identity.
— Originally published at the-decoder.com
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from The Decoder
See more →
An AI model programmed nonstop for 19 days on a single MirrorCode task that cost $2,600 to run
Epoch AI's MirrorCode benchmark reveals Claude Opus 4.7 as the leader with a 56% solve rate, reconstructing a 16,000-line toolkit in 14 hours. Despite this, all models tested struggle with the most complex tasks, highlighting limitations in current AI capabilities. The single task consumed $2,600 over 19 days, raising questions about cost-effectiveness in AI development.

