The Dynamics of Human and AI-Generated Language: How Semantics Fluctuates across Different Timescales
Quick Answer
This study introduces a semantic-timescale analysis pipeline to compare human and AI-generated speech, revealing that longer autocorrelation windows correlate with more generic vocabulary.
Quick Take
This study introduces a semantic-timescale analysis pipeline to compare human and AI-generated speech, revealing that longer autocorrelation windows correlate with more generic vocabulary. The findings suggest that temporal organization of semantic content is crucial for understanding differences in spoken narratives across various sources, including TTS and LLM-generated texts.
Key Points
- Introduces a pipeline for semantic time-series analysis of spoken narratives.
- Longer autocorrelation windows indicate more generic vocabulary in speech.
- Shorter autocorrelation windows are enriched with specific words.
- Findings apply to human narratives, TTS readings, and LLM-generated texts.
- Temporal organization is key for comparing human and AI speech.
Paper Resources
Article Content
From source RSS / original summaryarXiv:2606. 11371v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Spoken language, whether produced by humans or large language models (LLM), unfolds over time with varying semantic content. However, we still lack simple, interpretable time-series features that capture how generic versus specific content is distributed over time, and that can be used to compare human and AI-generated speech. We introduce a semantic-timescale analysis pipeline that turns word-level transcripts with timestamps into semantic time-series.
For each spoken narrative, we compute (i) semantic specificity using WordNet-based word depth and (ii) contextual similarity using SBERT embeddings and quantify their temporal dependence using autocorrelation-window measures (ACW-0 and related metrics). We then compare original speech to multiple shuffled controls that selectively disrupt lexical identity, temporal order, and word duration.
Across human-read autobiographical narratives, TTS readings, and LLM-generated texts rendered with TTS, we find that segments with longer ACW-0 in the semantic time-series tend to contain more generic vocabulary, whereas segments with shorter ACW-0 are enriched in more specific words. These associations are strongly attenuated or abolished when word order and timing are randomized, indicating that ACW-based measures capture non-trivial temporal organization of semantic content beyond static lexical distributions.
Our results suggest that ACW-based semantic timescales are a useful family of features for analyzing and comparing the temporal structure of human and AI-generated speech.
Reader Mode unavailable (could not extract clean content).
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from arXiv cs.CL
See more →Time to REFLECT: Can We Trust LLM Judges for Evidence-based Research Agents?
The REFLECT benchmark reveals that current LLM judges are unreliable, achieving below 55% accuracy in evaluating reasoning and evidence use, highlighting the need for improved evaluation methods for deep research agents.