Language Acquisition Device in Large Language Models
Quick Take
LAD-inspired pre-pretraining enhances LLM efficiency using MP-STRUCT formal language.
Key Points
- Pre-pretraining on synthetic languages improves data efficiency.
- MP-STRUCT encodes hierarchical composition and dependencies.
- Functional landmarks enhance dependency resolution in LLMs.
📖 Reader Mode
~2 min readAbstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) remain substantially less data-efficient than humans. Pre-pretraining (PPT) on synthetic languages has been proposed to close this gap, with prior work emphasizing highly expressive formal languages such as $k$-Shuffle Dyck. Inspired by the Language Acquisition Device (LAD) hypothesis, which posits that innate constraints preemptively restrict the learner's hypothesis space to natural-language-like structure, we propose LAD-inspired PPT: pre-pretraining on MP-STRUCT, a formal language whose strings encode hierarchical composition, feature-based dependencies, and long-distance displacement via MERGE, AGREE, and MOVE. A brief 500-step PPT with MP-STRUCT matches strong formal-language baselines in token efficiency while additionally imparting a human-like resistance to structurally implausible languages (e.g., REVERSE). Analyzing simplified variants, we find that MP-STRUCT CORE outperforms $k$-Shuffle Dyck despite not being definable in C-RASP (a formal bound on transformer expressivity), challenging the prior hypothesis that effective PPT languages must be both hierarchically expressive and circuit-theoretically learnable. We show that functional landmarks, which reduce dependency resolution ambiguity, are a key driver, suggesting that effective PPT design depends not only on expressivity but also on the accessibility of dependency resolution.
| Comments: | Accepted to ACL2026 Main Conference |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.16758 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2605.16758v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.16758 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Masato Mita [view email]
[v1]
Sat, 16 May 2026 02:13:32 UTC (215 KB)
— Originally published at arxiv.org
More from arXiv cs.CL
See more →Time to REFLECT: Can We Trust LLM Judges for Evidence-based Research Agents?
The reliability of LLM judges for evaluating deep research agents is critically assessed using the REFLECT benchmark.