Spatial Priming Outperforms Semantic Prompting: A Grid-Based Approach to Improving LLM Accuracy on Chart Data Extraction
Quick Take
Spatial priming significantly improves LLM accuracy in chart data extraction over semantic prompting.
Key Points
- Automated chart data extraction is crucial for literature analysis.
- Spatial priming outperformed semantic methods in experiments.
- Grid overlay reduced extraction error significantly.
📖 Reader Mode
~2 min readAbstract:The automated extraction of data from scientific charts is a critical task for large-scale literature analysis. While multimodal Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise, their accuracy on non-standardized charts remains a challenge. This raises a key research question: what is the most effective strategy to improve model performance (high-level semantic priming) or low-level spatial priming? This paper presents a comparative investigation into these two distinct strategies. We describe our exploratory experiments with semantic methods, such as a two-stage metadata-first framework and Chain-of-Thought, which failed to produce a statistically significant improvement. In contrast, we present a simple but highly effective spatial priming method: overlaying a coordinate grid onto the chart image before analysis. Our quantitative experiment on a synthetic dataset demonstrates that this grid-based approach provides a statistically significant reduction in data extraction error (SMAPE reduced from 25.5% to 19.5%, p < 0.05) compared to a baseline. We conclude that for the current generation of multimodal models, providing explicit spatial context is a more effective and reliable strategy than high-level semantic guidance for this class of tasks.
| Comments: | his is the version of the article accepted for publication in SUMMA 2025 after peer review. The final, published version is available at IEEE Xplore: this https URL |
| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science (cs.CE); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Software Engineering (cs.SE) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.08220 [cs.AI] |
| (or arXiv:2605.08220v1 [cs.AI] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.08220 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
|
| Journal reference: | 2025 7th International Conference on Control Systems, Mathematical Modeling, Automation and Energy Efficiency (SUMMA), Lipetsk, Russian Federation, 2025, pp. 799-804 |
| Related DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1109/SUMMA68668.2025.11302248
DOI(s) linking to related resources |
Submission history
From: Andrei Lazarev [view email]
[v1]
Wed, 6 May 2026 13:38:29 UTC (476 KB)
— Originally published at arxiv.org
More from arXiv cs.AI
See more →Invisible Orchestrators Suppress Protective Behavior and Dissociate Power-Holders: Safety Risks in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
Invisible orchestrators in multi-agent LLM systems pose significant safety risks and affect behavior dynamics.