Florida's lawsuit against OpenAI and CEO Altman treats ChatGPT as a defective product and public nuisance
Quick Answer
Florida has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and CEO Sam Altman, claiming ChatGPT poses risks to minors due to inadequate age checks and safety measures.
Quick Take
The 83-page complaint categorizes ChatGPT as a defective product, potentially leading to billions in penalties and setting a precedent for the chatbot industry.
Key Points
- Florida is the first US state to sue OpenAI and its CEO personally.
- The lawsuit claims ChatGPT lacks adequate age checks and safety investments.
- The complaint treats ChatGPT as a defective product under product liability laws.
- Potential penalties from the lawsuit could reach billions of dollars.
- This legal action may set a precedent for the entire chatbot industry.
📖 Reader Mode
~1 min read
Jun 5, 2026
Florida is the first US state to sue OpenAI and CEO Sam Altman personally. The 83-page complaint accuses the company of marketing ChatGPT as safe while the chatbot delivers dangerous content to minors, facilitates violence, and drives users toward dependency. Attorney General James Uthmeier says OpenAI "put children at great risk" and threatens penalties in the billions. Numerous cases are documented where people were harmed by ChatGPT and similar systems.
The suit treats ChatGPT as a product subject to liability and a "public nuisance," an unusual legal approach that could set a precedent for chatbot regulation. The free version has no real age verification, the complaint says, even though tens of thousands of users are under 13. Data collection starts before users agree to the terms of service. The suit even argues AI use causes cognitive erosion.
The complaint cites internal allegations too: Altman allegedly cut short safety testing for GPT-4o, and OpenAI put just 1 to 2 percent of its computing power toward AI safety instead of the promised 20 percent. OpenAI has not commented.
— Originally published at the-decoder.com
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from The Decoder
See more →
An AI model programmed nonstop for 19 days on a single MirrorCode task that cost $2,600 to run
Epoch AI's MirrorCode benchmark reveals Claude Opus 4.7 as the leader with a 56% solve rate, reconstructing a 16,000-line toolkit in 14 hours. Despite this, all models tested struggle with the most complex tasks, highlighting limitations in current AI capabilities. The single task consumed $2,600 over 19 days, raising questions about cost-effectiveness in AI development.
