OpenAI cofounder envisions "almost no interface" future where nobody learns software anymore
Quick Answer
OpenAI cofounder Greg Brockman acknowledges that ChatGPT's plugins failed due to unprepared models, envisioning a future with invisible, context-aware agents instead.
Quick Take
However, OpenAI's Codex is still far from achieving this advanced vision.
Key Points
- ChatGPT's plugins were heavily marketed but ultimately failed due to model limitations.
- Brockman envisions a future with minimal software interfaces for users.
- Current AI models, including Codex, are not yet capable of this vision.
- The shift towards context-aware agents could redefine user interaction with technology.
📖 Reader Mode
~1 min readOpenAI's "Plugins" failed because the AI models weren't good enough. Plugins launched in 2023 to add web search and third-party apps like Gmail to ChatGPT. "That didn't work. It didn't work at all because the models weren't ready," OpenAI co-founder Greg Brockman says. That didn't stop OpenAI from confidently marketing the technology, worth keeping in mind next time the company hypes a new product.
Brockman wants to take things in a different direction going forward. In his view, people shouldn't have to learn software anymore, and ChatGPT should become an invisible layer for handing off digital tasks. "You want almost no interface, you want no product," he says. The goal is a persistent, context-aware agent that acts on its own, not an app packed with ever more features.
OpenAI's own products still contradict that vision. A tool like Codex is light-years from an invisible interface. AI models also still aren't reliable enough, and closing that gap requires heavy prompt work and custom integrations. Anthropic, OpenAI, and Microsoft have all spun up separate companies for exactly that reason, sending teams on-site to help businesses integrate AI.
— Originally published at the-decoder.com
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from The Decoder
See more →
An AI model programmed nonstop for 19 days on a single MirrorCode task that cost $2,600 to run
Epoch AI's MirrorCode benchmark reveals Claude Opus 4.7 as the leader with a 56% solve rate, reconstructing a 16,000-line toolkit in 14 hours. Despite this, all models tested struggle with the most complex tasks, highlighting limitations in current AI capabilities. The single task consumed $2,600 over 19 days, raising questions about cost-effectiveness in AI development.
