Artificial Adaptive Intelligence: The Missing Stage Between Narrow and General Intelligence
Quick Take
The article introduces Artificial Adaptive Intelligence (AAI) as a critical stage between narrow and general intelligence.
Key Points
- AAI requires no human-specified hyperparameters.
- Introduces an adaptivity index for performance measurement.
- Identifies pathways to achieve parametric minimality.
📖 Reader Mode
~2 min readAbstract:Between the narrow systems we deploy and the general intelligence we speculate about lies an entire regime of machine behavior that has never received its own name. This monograph argues that this regime is not empty: it is where meta-learning, neural architecture search, AutoML, continual learning, evolutionary computation, and physics-informed modeling have quietly converged on a common principle, namely the steady removal of the human from the loop of parameter specification. We name this regime Artificial Adaptive Intelligence (AAI) and define it operationally: a system exhibits AAI to the extent that it requires no human-specified tunable hyperparameters while maintaining competitive performance across a diverse distribution of tasks. To make the definition quantitative, we introduce an adaptivity index that measures progress along an axis orthogonal to scale, combining the fraction of hyperparameters absorbed by the system with the performance ratio against a task-specialized baseline. We develop the principle of parametric minimality and ground it in the minimum description length framework, showing that the appropriate hyperparameter count is data-determined rather than designer-determined. We then organize the field around three pathways to minimality: data- and task-aware configuration, structural and evolutionary morphing, and in-training self-adaptation. We analyze their stability, convergence, and governance implications, and illustrate them through case studies spanning aerospace design, financial regime detection, turbulence modeling, ecological dynamics, and vision-language systems. The thesis is that the path from ANI to AGI passes through AAI, and that naming this stage changes what we measure, what we build, and what we call a success.
| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.16844 [cs.AI] |
| (or arXiv:2605.16844v1 [cs.AI] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.16844 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Boris Kriuk [view email]
[v1]
Sat, 16 May 2026 07:04:28 UTC (77 KB)
— Originally published at arxiv.org
More from arXiv cs.AI
See more →From Prompts to Protocols: An AI Agent for Laboratory Automation
An AI agent integrates large language models for automating laboratory protocols, enhancing efficiency and accuracy.