Targeted Remasking: Replacing Token Editing with Token-to-Mask Refinement in Discrete Diffusion Language Models
Quick Take
The Token-to-Mask remasking improves discrete diffusion models by purifying context and enhancing token-level output accuracy.
Key Points
- Introduces Token-to-Mask (T2M) remasking for cleaner context.
- Empirically validated across 12 diverse benchmarks.
- Achieves up to +5.92% improvement in mathematics tasks.
Article Content
From source RSS / original summaryarXiv:2605. 26436v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Discrete masked diffusion language models such as LLaDA generate text through iterative denoising, where mask tokens are progressively replaced with predicted tokens. LLaDA2. 1 introduced a Token-to-Token (T2T) editing mechanism that accelerates generation by directly replacing committed tokens suspected of being incorrect.
However, we identify fundamental limitations of T2T editing: it couples error detection with replacement, pollutes the generation context with potentially incorrect tokens, and introduces a train-inference noise mismatch where systematic model-generated errors differ from the random perturbations seen during training.
We propose Token-to-Mask (T2M) remasking, a training-free, drop-in replacement for T2T editing that resets suspected erroneous tokens back to the mask state, allowing the diffusion process to re-predict them under cleaner context.
We design and empirically validate three complementary error detection strategies -- probability-based, trigger-mirrored, and temporal-difference-based -- and provide a unified theoretical analysis showing that T2M remasking purifies the generation context, converts systematic inference errors back to the model's native mask noise type, and enables delayed commitment for joint multi-position optimization.
Comprehensive experiments across 12 benchmarks spanning knowledge, reasoning, mathematics, coding, and instruction following show that T2M generally improves performance on tasks requiring precise token-level output, with the largest gain on mathematics (+5. 92% on CMATH). Error analysis on CMATH reveals that the dominant failure mode is last-mile token corruption -- where correct reasoning produces a corrupted final answer -- and that T2M repairs 59. 4% of such cases.
Reader Mode unavailable (could not extract clean content).
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from arXiv cs.CL
See more →Time to REFLECT: Can We Trust LLM Judges for Evidence-based Research Agents?
The reliability of LLM judges for evaluating deep research agents is critically assessed using the REFLECT benchmark.