DEL: Digit Entropy Loss for Numerical Learning of Large Language Models
Quick Take
Digit Entropy Loss (DEL) enhances numerical learning in LLMs, improving accuracy in number prediction.
Key Points
- DEL reformulates unsupervised entropy optimization for better number prediction.
- It generalizes learning from integers to floating-point numbers.
- Experiments show DEL outperforms existing numerical learning methods.
📖 Reader Mode
~2 min readAbstract:Number prediction stands as a fundamental capability of large language models (LLMs) in mathematical problem-solving and code generation. The widely adopted maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) for LLM training is not tailored to number prediction. Recently, penalty-driven approaches, e.g., Number Token Loss and Discretized Distance Loss, introduce an inductive bias of numerical distance but induce over-sharpened and over-flattened digit distributions, respectively. In this paper, we make an in-depth analysis on LLM numerical learning, and show that existing numerical learning methods conceptually follow a criterion-distance formulation, where the criterion term represents optimization pattern and the distance term instills geometric prior. Consequently, we present Digit Entropy Loss (DEL) for auto-regressive numerical learning, which reformulates the conventional unsupervised entropy optimization in three key designs: leveraging digit conditional probability and binary cross-entropy to guide the entropy optimization into a supervised manner; deprecating the distance term to bypass the issue of numerical distance; and generalizing the integer-based numerical learning to floating-point number optimization, enabling more accurate number prediction. Our DEL formulation can incorporate integers, decimals, and decimal points, expanding the learning objective from a single digit to the floating-point number domain. Experiments conducted on seven mathematical reasoning benchmarks with four representative LLMs, including CodeLlama, Mistral, DeepSeek, and Qwen-2.5, demonstrate that DEL consistently outperforms its counterparts in both overall prediction accuracy and numerical distance. Source codes are at this https URL
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.20369 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2605.20369v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.20369 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Zhaohui Zheng [view email]
[v1]
Tue, 19 May 2026 18:18:59 UTC (1,043 KB)
— Originally published at arxiv.org
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from arXiv cs.CL
See more →Time to REFLECT: Can We Trust LLM Judges for Evidence-based Research Agents?
The reliability of LLM judges for evaluating deep research agents is critically assessed using the REFLECT benchmark.