Cyberbullying Governance on Social Media: A Unified Framework from Content Identification to Intervention
Quick Take
This paper proposes a unified full-lifecycle governance framework for cyberbullying on social media, shifting from passive detection to proactive moderation across four stages: content identification, user modeling, diffusion dynamics, and intervention. It highlights the need for continuous governance to address online toxicity effectively and discusses challenges like explainability and algorithmic fairness.
Key Points
- The framework integrates continuous governance to combat cyberbullying effectively.
- It covers four stages: content identification, user modeling, diffusion dynamics, and intervention.
- Emerging challenges include multimodality, explainability, and algorithmic fairness.
- The paper reviews datasets and evaluation practices for future research.
- It aims to create a safer digital ecosystem against online toxicity.
Article Content
From source RSS / original summaryarXiv:2605. 27584v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The proliferation of social media platforms and online communities has inadvertently catalyzed the spread of cyberbullying, hate speech, and other forms of online toxicity, making the effective governance of such harm a critical societal and computational challenge. While significant strides have been made in automating content moderation, existing research predominantly treats cyberbullying governance as passive, isolated detection at the post level.
This reductionist view overlooks the continuous behavioral dynamics of users, the structural diffusion of toxic events, and the critical need for proactive mitigation. To bridge these gaps, this paper proposes a unified full-lifecycle governance framework that shifts the paradigm of cyberbullying governance from isolated static detection toward integrated, continuous, and proactive moderation.
Drawing on cyberbullying research and adjacent fields, we systematically synthesize the state-of-the-art literature across four interconnected stages: (1) Content Identification, (2) User and Behavior Modeling, (3) Diffusion Dynamics and Early Warning, and (4) Intervention and Governance.
Furthermore, we review available datasets and evaluation practices, and discuss emerging challenges including multimodality, explainability, algorithmic fairness, and the dual-use risks of generative AI, providing a roadmap for future research toward a safer and more resilient digital ecosystem.
Reader Mode unavailable (could not extract clean content).
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from arXiv cs.AI
See more →The Importance of Out-of-Band Metadata for Safe Autonomous Agents: The Redpanda Agentic Data Plane
The Redpanda Agentic Data Plane (ADP) introduces out-of-band metadata channels to enhance the safety of autonomous AI agents, ensuring secure data access and tamper-proof audit trails. This architecture mitigates risks associated with unpredictable AI behavior by enforcing governance throughout the agent lifecycle, demonstrated in a multi-agent trading system with strict data scoping and approval thresholds.