Long-Context Reasoning Through Proxy-Based Chain-of-Thought Tuning
Quick Take
ProxyCoT enhances long-context reasoning by transferring skills from short proxy contexts.
Key Points
- Models struggle with long-context reasoning despite large token support.
- ProxyCoT uses proxy contexts for effective reasoning transfer.
- Experiments show improved performance with reduced computational costs.
📖 Reader Mode
~2 min readAbstract:Recent large language models support inputs of up to 10 million tokens, yet they perform poorly on long-context tasks that require complex reasoning. Such tasks can be solved using only a subset of the input -- a proxy context -- rather than the full sequence. Despite sharing the same underlying reasoning process, models exhibit a significant performance disparity between proxy and full contexts. To improve long-context reasoning, we propose ProxyCoT, a novel training framework that transfers reasoning capabilities from short proxy contexts to full long contexts. Specifically, we first obtain high-quality chain-of-thought reasoning traces on proxy contexts through reinforcement learning or distillation from a larger teacher model, and then ground the generated traces in full long contexts with supervised fine-tuning. Experiments across different datasets demonstrate that ProxyCoT consistently outperforms strong baselines with reduced computational overhead. Furthermore, models trained with ProxyCoT generalize their long-context reasoning capabilities to out-of-domain tasks.
| Comments: | Long, ACL 2026 (Main conference) |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.20201 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2605.20201v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.20201 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
Submission history
From: Miao Li [view email]
[v1]
Mon, 6 Apr 2026 16:44:17 UTC (887 KB)
— Originally published at arxiv.org
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from arXiv cs.CL
See more →Time to REFLECT: Can We Trust LLM Judges for Evidence-based Research Agents?
The reliability of LLM judges for evaluating deep research agents is critically assessed using the REFLECT benchmark.