Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models for Schema-Constrained Clinical Information Extraction
Quick Take
A modular retrieval-augmented generation pipeline improves schema-constrained clinical information extraction from nurse-patient transcripts.
Key Points
- Focuses on extracting observations from nurse-patient transcripts.
- Achieved 80.36% F1 score using GPT-5.2 with full schema.
- RAG consistently enhances performance with second-pass auditing.
📖 Reader Mode
~2 min readAbstract:Conversational nurse-patient transcripts contain actionable observations, but converting these transcripts into structured representations at scale remains challenging. Documentation burden is substantial, with prior studies showing clinicians spend large portions of their workday on documentation and related desk work rather than direct patient care. MEDIQA-SYNUR focuses on observation extraction from conversational nurse-patient transcripts, requiring systems to normalize these narratives into a predefined schema with value-type constraints. We propose a modular retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipeline that uses the training set as an exemplar corpus, combines schema-constrained prompting (full schema vs. pruned candidate schema), deterministic schema-based postprocessing, and a second-pass audit, with two LLM backbones: Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct and GPT-5.2 with corresponding embedding models for RAG. Our best configuration uses GPT-5.2 with full schema, RAG, and a second-pass auditing, achieving 80.36% F1 score. Overall, our results show that RAG consistently improves performance, while the optimal degree of schema constraint depends on the model, and second-pass auditing yields modest additional gains by correcting residual schema-adherence errors.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.15467 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2605.15467v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.15467 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: A H M Rezaul Karim [view email]
[v1]
Thu, 14 May 2026 23:13:05 UTC (555 KB)
— Originally published at arxiv.org
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from arXiv cs.CL
See more →Time to REFLECT: Can We Trust LLM Judges for Evidence-based Research Agents?
The reliability of LLM judges for evaluating deep research agents is critically assessed using the REFLECT benchmark.