Puzzled By ChatGPT? No more! A Jigsaw Puzzle to Promote AI Literacy and Awareness
Quick Take
A jigsaw puzzle promotes AI literacy through interactive storytelling and visual engagement.
Key Points
- Game-based approach enhances understanding of AI technologies.
- Comic-infographic illustrates AI capabilities and limitations.
- Encourages collaborative learning in informal settings.
📖 Reader Mode
~2 min readAbstract:The rapid adoption of Generative AI, including LLM-based chatbots like ChatGPT, has highlighted the need for accessible ways to support public understanding and AI literacy. To address this need, we introduce a game-based, interactive approach in the form of a jigsaw puzzle whose completed image is a comic-based infographic illustrating the workings, capabilities, limitations, and societal implications of these technologies. Each comic sketch also functions as a standalone informational card, providing focused explanations of specific facets of AI use, design, and impact. The visual content was created in a live collaborative session with a professional illustrator and a multidisciplinary group of experts and non experts, combining structured knowledge with informal, exploratory reflections shared during the discussion. By integrating hands-on assembly, visual storytelling, and collaborative interaction, the puzzle provides an engaging and playful tool for exploring the mechanisms, perks, and perils of AI systems in informal learning contexts.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.20404 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2605.20404v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.20404 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Francesca Padovani [view email]
[v1]
Tue, 19 May 2026 19:00:41 UTC (8,233 KB)
— Originally published at arxiv.org
Want this in your inbox every morning?
Daily brief at your local 8am — bilingual EN/中文, free.
More from arXiv cs.CL
See more →arXiv cs.CL·Leyao Wang, Yanan He, Peng Chen, Asaf Yehudai, Yixin Liu, Rex Ying, Michal Shmueli-Scheuer, Arman Cohan
1d ago FeaturedOriginal
Time to REFLECT: Can We Trust LLM Judges for Evidence-based Research Agents?
AI Summary
The reliability of LLM judges for evaluating deep research agents is critically assessed using the REFLECT benchmark.